Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens

Heidaritabar, M.; Calus, M.P.L.; Vereijken, A.; Groenen, M.A.M.; Bastiaansen, J.W.M.


Genotype imputation has become a standard practice in modern genetic research to increase genome coverage and improve the accuracy of genomic selection (GS) and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We assessed accuracies of imputing 60K genotype data from lower density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels using a small set of the most common sires in a population of 2140 white layer chickens. Several factors affecting imputation accuracy were investigated, including the size of the reference population, the level of the relationship between the reference and validation populations, and minor allele frequency (MAF) of the SNP being imputed. Results The accuracy of imputation was assessed with different scenarios using 22 and 62 carefully selected reference animals (Ref 22 and Ref 62 ). Animal-specific imputation accuracy corrected for gene content was moderate on average (~ 0.80) in most scenarios and low in the 3K to 60K scenario. Maximum average accuracies were 0.90 and 0.93 for the most favourable scenario for Ref 22 and Ref 62 respectively, when SNPs were masked independent of their MAF. SNPs with low MAF were more difficult to impute, and the larger reference population considerably improved the imputation accuracy for these rare SNPs. When Ref 22 was used for imputation, the average imputation accuracy decreased by 0.04 when validation population was two instead of one generation away from the reference and increased again by 0.05 when validation was three generations away. Selecting the reference animals from the most common sires, compared with random animals from the population, considerably improved imputation accuracy for low MAF SNPs, but gave only limited improvement for other MAF classes. The allelic R 2 measure from Beagle software was found to be a good predictor of imputation reliability (correlation┬┐~┬┐0.8) when the density of validation panel was very low (3K) and the MAF of the SNP and the size of the reference population were not extremely small. Conclusions Even with a very small number of animals in the reference population, reasonable accuracy of imputation can be achieved. Selecting a set of the most common sires, rather than selecting random animals for the reference population, improves the imputation accuracy of rare alleles, which may be a benefit when imputing with whole genome re-sequencing data.